Consider for example, the definition of Do we gave above.
Do: <> == VERB <mor root> == do <mor past> == did <mor past participle> == done <mor present tense sing three> == does.Filling in the gaps between these definitions, we can see that many paths will be implicitly defined only by the empty path specification. Examples include:
Do: <mor> == VERB <syn> == VERB <mor present> == VERB <syn cat> == VERB <syn type> == VERB <mor present tense sing one> == VERB.If there had been no definition for <>, then none of these example paths would have been defined at all, since there would have been no leading subpath with a definition. Note how <mor> itself takes its definition from <>, since all the explicitly defined <mor ...> specifications have at least one further attribute.
The definition for <mor past> overrides default definition from <> and in turn provides a definition for longer paths. However, <mor past participle> blocks default definition from <mor past>. The past participle extensions shown below are purely for the sake of the formal example - they have no role to play in the morphological description of English (but cf. French where past participles inflect for gender and number):
Do: <mor past tense> == did <mor past tense plur> == did <mor past tense sing three> == did <mor past participle plur> == done <mor past participle sing one> == done.Similarly all the <mor present> forms inherit from VERB except for the explicitly cited <mor present tense sing three>.
Definition by default introduces new DATR sentences each of whose left-hand-side paths is an extension of the left-hand-side paths of some explicit sentence. This path extension carries over to any paths occurring on the right-hand-side as well. So for example, the sentence:
VERB: <mor present tense> == "<mor root>" <mor form> == <mor "<syn form>">.gives rise to the following, inter alia:
VERB: <mor present tense sing> == "<mor root sing>" <mor present tense plur> == "<mor root plur>" <mor form present> == <mor "<syn form present>" present> <mor form passive> == <mor "<syn form passive>" passive>.This extension occurs for all paths in the right-hand-side, whether they are quoted or unquoted and/or nested in descriptor sequences or evaluable paths.
The intent of this path extension is to allow descriptors to provide not simply a single definition for a path but a whole set of definitions for extensions to that path, without losing path information. In some cases this can lead to gratuitous extensions to paths - path attributes specifying detail beyond any of the specifications in the overall description. However, this does not generally cause problems since such gratuitously detailed paths, being unspecified, will always take their value from the most specific path that is specified (effectively, gratuitous detail is ignored, thus, for example, the path <mor plur acc> is a gratuitous extension of the path <mor plur> for English common nouns since the latter are not differentiated for case). Indeed, DATR's approach to default information always implies an infinite number of unwritten DATR statements, with paths of arbitrary length.